New startup ideas · AI and software · Developer tools

startup idea

Govmodules

A cross-border marketplace for accredited, evidence-backed government software modules and agents.

Govmodules is a marketplace where vendors list software modules and coding agents that have passed government-grade checks, each shipped with a machine-readable evidence pack (provenance, dependency lineage, test and accreditation results, who reviewed what).

Marketplace
Government and public sector
$10-100B market
Platform others build on
Global from day one

3/5

venture judge

similar startups, last 2 years (2 all-time)

94%

of 3 nearest real companies still alive

yes

2 matching federal grants and programs

Direction supported by government programs and grants

Test it before you build it

$600 · 5 weeks · 35 prospects

For $600 in five weeks, learn whether state reviewers will accept another jurisdiction's evidence pack and whether vendors will pay $4,000 to carry one.

Riskiest assumption · A state agency's security and procurement reviewers will accept another jurisdiction's evidence pack in place of parts of their own review, cutting a vendor's path to purchase by months rather than zero.

1Focus group: who and where

Two people at once: the security or accreditation officer at a US state agency (HHS or labor department scale) who is mid-review on a vendor identity or eligibility component this quarter, and the head of delivery at a 20-200 person government software vendor or integrator whose sales stall for months in every new state's review.

where to find 35 · The Digital Services Coalition member directory (a list of exactly these vendors and integrators), the StateRAMP authorized product list and its provider working groups (directory plus the accreditation world itself), the GovLoop online community for public-sector IT staff (community), and NASCIO's annual fall conference and published state CIO contacts (event).

2Sell first, build later

A design-partner pilot: we build the machine-readable evidence pack for one of your identity or eligibility modules and present it to two additional state agencies within 60 days of signature.

the ask · $4,000 per pilot, half invoiced up front on signature.

a real yes · A real yes is a signed SOW plus $2,000 received, or from an agency a signed letter naming the module and a dated review slot. Enthusiastic reviewer feedback, unpaid pilot offers and intros are not yeses.

3Small experiments

The first one attacks the riskiest assumption; each ends with a number that says whether to run the next.

1. Evidence-reuse acceptance test
$350 · 14 days
Build a sample machine-readable evidence pack (provenance, dependency lineage, test results, reviewer sign-offs) for a real open-source identity module such as Keycloak, as a 6-page PDF plus JSON. Book 15 20-minute reviews with state agency security and accreditation staff recruited through GovLoop, StateRAMP working groups and NASCIO contacts, and ask one question: which of your review steps would this replace under your current policy, and which would you still run.
keep going if · 8 of 15 reviewers name at least one concrete step (vendor questionnaire, dependency audit) the pack would replace without a policy change
2. Integrator resell interviews
$0 · 10 days
Call 8 delivery leads at Digital Services Coalition member firms and ask whether pre-cleared evidence packs would shorten their state engagements, whether they would resell listed modules, and what they would pay per pack. Run on the public member directory and referrals, no spend.
keep going if · 5 of 8 say a prior-state pack would cut a named number of weeks from a current engagement
3. Paid design-partner pilots
$250 · 21 days
Pitch 12 vendors from the StateRAMP product list and the DSC directory a $4,000 design-partner pilot: we build the evidence pack for one of your modules and present it to two additional state agencies within 60 days, $2,000 invoiced on signature. The $250 covers a reviewed SOW template, a one-page site and pack production tooling.
keep going if · 2 of 12 vendors sign the SOW and pay the $2,000 up front

4Collect a deposit up front

Tesla took $1,000 refundable reservations for the Model 3 and $100 for the Cybertruck before building either: the deposit is the measurement, not the revenue.

$2,000

per prospect, refundable

how · A paid design-partner pilot: the vendor signs a one-page SOW and pays $2,000 of the $4,000 by invoice on signature, balance on delivery of the pack. Vendors and integrators are commercial companies who can pay an invoice this size without procurement, which is why the money comes from them and not from agencies; from agencies collect only a signed letter naming the module and a review date. set up: Stripe Invoicing ↗

what it reserves · One of three design-partner slots in the first cohort, the vendor's module in the first evidence pack presented to two additional state agencies within 60 days, and the design-partner rate locked for year-one listing fees.

refund · The $2,000 is refunded in full if the evidence pack is not delivered within 60 days of SOW signature.

target · 2 signed SOWs with $2,000 received each from 12 vendor conversations within 35 days.

before taking money · State officials cannot accept payments or gifts and agencies cannot pay deposits, so collect money only from vendors and integrators and follow each state's ethics rules when interviewing officials.

Go: build it if

At least 8 of 15 state reviewers name specific review steps the pack would replace under current policy, and 2 vendors sign SOWs with $2,000 each received.

Kill: stop if

10 or more of 15 reviewers say policy requires their own full review regardless of prior evidence, or 0 paid pilots after 12 vendor and 8 integrator conversations; reused evidence saves nothing and the marketplace has no reason to exist.

5 Scripts to run itoutreach message, landing copy, deposit terms · click to open

outreach message

You review identity and eligibility components for your agency, and every new vendor means another full security and accreditation pass by your team. I am testing whether a machine-readable evidence pack, provenance, dependency lineage, test and review results already cleared by another state, would let you skip specific steps instead of repeating the whole review. I have a sample pack built for a real identity module. Can I walk you through it in 20 minutes and hear which steps it would or would not replace?

landing page

Accreditation evidence that travels with your module across states $4,000 design-partner pilot: one evidence pack built and presented to two state agencies within 60 days Book a scoping call

deposit terms

The pilot is $4,000: $2,000 invoiced when you sign the statement of work, $2,000 when your evidence pack ships. The up-front payment reserves one of three design-partner slots and puts your named module in the pack we present to two additional state agencies within 60 days. If we do not deliver your pack within 60 days of signature, the up-front payment is refunded in full.

Would you run this test?

One tap. The yes-share feeds the Demand pillar of this idea's score; nobody sees who answered.

Budgets are out-of-pocket estimates for a team of one to three, US market. Size the deposit to the deal, and check the terms before taking money in a regulated line.

Scorecard

One score that balances how trendy the idea is, the demand for it and its potential for 100x, with competition measured relative to every other idea in the catalog. Recent startup trends first, government priorities second.

Idea Score, 0-100 · raw 27.5 x 1.61

Warm

competition: more crowded than 20% of ideas · headwind x0.90

+1.2

government priorities, secondary (2 matching grants)

Trend

Is the wave forming now? 2025-26 entrants vs 2023-24, rounds since 2025, the sector's live-batch direction, the 2026 trend analyst.

Entrants 2025-26 vs 2023-24 (similar companies)70
Rounds announced 2025+ in the sector16
Sector direction (live batch)0
2026 trend analyst25

Demand

Does anyone want it? YC's current RFS, companies already paid for something similar, the operator judge, founders' yes-rate in decks, readers who would run the test.

YC asks for it (current RFS: idea / sector)30
Someone already pays (similar companies, recent / all-time)17
Operator judge: real pain0

100x potential

Can it return a fund? The venture judge (double weight), market-size and moat axes, neighbours still alive, the technologist judge.

Venture judge50
Market size axis67
Moat axis100
Technologist judge25

Score = 100 x cbrt(Trend x Demand x 100x) x (1 - 0.5 x crowding) + government bonus (max 5), calibrated so the 95th-percentile idea scores 90 (order never changes). A geometric mean: a weak pillar cannot be papered over. Percentiles are among the 272 ideas in the catalog; the terms matched were cross-border, marketplace, accredited, evidence-backed, government, modules, vendors, list.

The idea in full

What: Govmodules is a marketplace where vendors list software modules and coding agents that have passed government-grade checks, each shipped with a machine-readable evidence pack (provenance, dependency lineage, test and accreditation results, who reviewed what). Agencies in the US, EU and UK buy through their existing framework contracts, and system integrators resell and assemble modules on top of Govmodules's provenance API. The data moat is cumulative: once a module has cleared an accreditation in one jurisdiction, the next agency inherits the evidence instead of repeating the review, and Govmodules is the only party holding the cross-agency record.
Why now: Government-facing software factories are being funded now (Hoplite, yc S26, on deploying cloud software factories), and Scope, yc X26, is already selling discoverability of software to AI agents, which is the same provenance question from the commercial side. NSF is separately funding an "Automated Artificial Intelligence (AI) Reliability Evaluation Platform" I-Corps translation (~$50k), a signal that evaluating machine-produced software is becoming a fundable public-sector need.
Wedge: first customer and entry point: One narrow module class in one program: identity and eligibility components for a single US state agency, listed with evidence packs and sold through the integrator that already holds the contract, then the same packs offered to the next two states.
Path to 100x: Government software and IT spend is a $10-100B addressable slice across US, EU and UK frameworks, and the platform wins because integrators build their delivery practice on the provenance API, which makes listing there the default for vendors. The accumulated cross-jurisdiction evidence graph is the asset no second marketplace can copy, so the first exchange to reach critical listing density takes most of the category.
Ceiling: Procurement is national and slow, so the company ends up as three separate country businesses with local integrators capturing most of the margin.
Closest real companies, as the generator saw them: Hoplite deploys cloud software factories for a single buyer's environment, while Govmodules is the cross-agency exchange those factories publish into; Scope makes software discoverable to AI agents commercially, without accreditation evidence or public procurement rails. AtlasGrid accelerates product iteration inside one company rather than across buyers.
Main risk: Procurement rules force every agency to run its own review anyway, so reused evidence saves nothing and the marketplace has no reason to exist.

Five judges

Each judge scores every idea in the catalog with a named rubric; the venture judge decides whether a card is shown at all (4-5 is venture-grade).

Venture investor
3/5
Cross-jurisdiction evidence graph genuinely compounds, but per-country procurement and integrator margin capture likely fragment it into three country businesses.
Bootstrapper
1/5
Cross-border government procurement through state agencies and integrators is the longest sales cycle available, with no revenue a two-person team can reach.
Operator
1/5
Reused accreditation only pays off if every agency stops running its own review, which is the whole industry moving first.
Technologist
2/5
The provenance API is metadata plumbing; the real asset is procurement paperwork accumulation, not engineering a rival cannot reproduce.
Risk
3/5
Public procurement rails are legally solid, but the wedge is one US state agency plus one incumbent integrator that already owns the contract.
trends
2/5
Cross-border accreditation reuse has no dated trigger; a $50k NSF I-Corps grant and one software-factory startup do not open a window.

Similar startups in the directory

Companies whose pitch matches most of the idea's terms (cross-border, marketplace, accredited, evidence-backed, government, modules, vendors, list): 2 all-time, 1 from the last two years. Same matching as Idea Check.

Alt-Xyc W26 · 2026 · Fintechalive
Building the best venue for private markets exposure.
Postalyc W22 · 2022 · B2B SaaSalive
An AI native virtual address & mailroom for businesses.

Run this as an Idea Check →

The generator's reference companies

Real companies the model named as closest when it wrote the card, with their fate. A check mark is a company the radar could verify in its directory.

Public money in this direction

US federal grants, SBIR/STTR awards and open opportunities from the radar's public-money feed, matched to the idea's terms; the sector totals give the context.

grants and programs matching the idea

122

startup-relevant grants in Developer tools

$70M

awarded in the sector, tracked

opportunities open now in the sector

Environmental Sensor for Detection of PFASawardhigh relevance
NIH / NIEHS · STTR phase I · $313K · posted 2025-07-24
POSE: Phase I: Tile-Debugger: Enabling Accessible, Flexible, and Insightful Debugging for AI Workloads on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) and Acceleratorsawardmedium relevance
National Science Foundation · POSE · $300K · posted 2026-07-07

All public money by sector →

Market signal

What the radar sees in Developer tools: new companies by cohort year, the forming YC batch, and outcomes since the February snapshot.

Developer tools · 64 → 105 → 115 → 77 → 43 new companies 2022 → 2026 · 87% aliveYC F26: 8 in this cluster, 6% of the batch (was 3% in S26) (W27 is still forming: 5 listed)Since February, of 454 YC companies here: 7 acquired, 9 shut down, 48 rewrote their pitch

Developer tools: companies, trend and grants →

Design attributes

The card is one cell of a designed set: every axis below was chosen before the text was written, and the text had to realize it.

Buyer: Government and public sector
Business model: Marketplace
Path to 100x: Platform others build on
Market size: $10-100B market
Capital intensity: Capital-medium (ops, field teams)
Speed to revenue: Revenue in 1-3 years
Technical depth: Real engineering
Go-to-market: Partners and channels
Moat: Data moat
Geography: Global from day one
Regulation: Heavily regulated
Vibe: Hot space