New startup ideas · Fintech · Fintech

startup idea

Attestry

The global registry that stops government payments to impostor suppliers.

Attestry is a shared registry of verified government suppliers and their real bank accounts: before a treasury or municipality releases a payment, its ERP checks the payee against the registry through a no-code integration.

3/5

venture judge

1

similar startups, last 2 years (20 all-time)

95%

of 3 nearest real companies still alive

yes

6 matching federal grants and programs

Direction supported by government programs and grants

Test it before you build it

$1,000 · 6 weeks · 20 prospects

Proves mid-size city and county treasuries will issue purchase orders for payee verification this budget year under micro-purchase authority, for $1,000 in six weeks

Riskiest assumption · A mid-size city or county finance director who has seen an impostor-payment attempt will buy a payee-verification pilot this budget year under existing micro-purchase authority, alone, without waiting for other governments to join the registry or for a formal RFP

1Focus group: who and where

The finance director or treasurer of a US city or county of 50,000 to 500,000 residents whose office has seen a vendor-impersonation or bank-account-change fraud attempt in the last two years, and who can approve purchases under roughly $5,000 without a competitive bid

where to find 20 · GFOA state chapters and their membership rolls (the association every one of these buyers belongs to), the ELGL community and its Slack (where local-government finance staff actually talk shop), Tyler Technologies ERP user groups and forums (the channel reaching the dominant local-government ERP install base), and counties' own published vendor-payment files (a directory for picking targets that provably publish what fraudsters exploit)

2Sell first, build later

A payment-fraud pilot: Attestry verifies your top 500 suppliers and their real bank accounts within 30 days of kickoff, delivers the verified-payee list your AP team checks before every release, and reserves your jurisdiction a founding seat in the first five-member cross-jurisdiction registry cohort

the ask · $4,500 per jurisdiction for the pilot, deliberately priced under typical micro-purchase thresholds; $9,000 per year subscription afterward at a founding rate locked three years

a real yes · A real yes is an issued purchase order or a paid invoice; a director saying 'we need this', an unpaid trial of the report, or a request to present to the county board next quarter are not yeses

3Small experiments

The first one attacks the riskiest assumption; each ends with a number that says whether to run the next.

  1. 1. Finance director fraud interviews

    $400 · 14 days

    Book 20 calls with finance directors recruited through GFOA state chapter rolls and ELGL. Ask two questions: has your office seen an impostor-vendor or bank-change fraud attempt in the last 24 months, and what can you buy under your micro-purchase or small-purchase threshold without an RFP. The second question is the kill question, because the card's stated risk is procurement outlasting runway.

    keep going if · 10 of 20 report an attempted or successful impostor payment in the last 24 months AND confirm sign-off authority under $5,000 without a competitive bid

  2. 2. Sample verified-payee report demo

    $300 · 10 days

    Pull one target county's published vendor-payment file, verify its top 100 vendors by hand against secretary of state records and independent call-backs to numbers you source yourself, and package the result as a branded verified-payee report with the mismatches flagged. Demo it to 15 of the interviewed directors as exactly what their $4,500 pilot delivers for their top 500 suppliers.

    keep going if · 5 of 15 demos end with the finance director asking for a quote to send to purchasing

  3. 3. Micro-purchase PO collection

    $300 · 21 days

    Send each interested director a complete quote packet priced at $4,500: scope, W-9, certificate of insurance, and a fill-in justification memo for their file, then register in their vendor portals the same week. Count issued purchase orders, not verbal approvals, and log every jurisdiction where the quote gets routed into a formal RFP instead.

    keep going if · 3 purchase orders issued within 21 days of the first quote going out

4Collect a deposit up front

Tesla took $1,000 refundable reservations for the Model 3 and $100 for the Cybertruck before building either: the deposit is the measurement, not the revenue.

$0

no cash yet: take a signed commitment

how · An issued purchase order for the $4,500 pilot, signed under the jurisdiction's micro-purchase or small-purchase authority by the finance director, with the invoice payable at kickoff; public treasuries cannot credibly wire deposits before a vendor is onboarded, so the PO with a dated kickoff is the money-equivalent commitment, and the $4,500 price exists precisely to fit under the no-bid threshold set up: Stripe Invoicing ↗

what it reserves · A founding seat in the first five-jurisdiction registry cohort, their top 500 suppliers verified first, and the $4,500 pilot price locked as a $9,000-per-year founding subscription rate for three years

refund · The order can be cancelled in writing at no charge any time before kickoff, and the invoice is voided if verification is not delivered within 30 days of kickoff

target · 3 issued purchase orders from 20 finance-director conversations within 45 days

before taking money · Government purchasing rules apply: confirm each jurisdiction's micro-purchase threshold before quoting, never split invoices to stay under it, and handle supplier bank-account data only under a written data-security addendum.

Go: build it if

3 purchase orders issued from 20 conversations within 6 weeks, with at least 10 of 20 directors reporting a recent impostor attempt

Kill: stop if

Fewer than 5 of 20 directors report any impostor attempt in the last 24 months, or 0 purchase orders with every interested buyer routing the $4,500 into an RFP cycle longer than 90 days

5 Scripts to run itoutreach message, landing copy, deposit terms · click to open

outreach message

Your office publishes its vendor list and payment calendar because the law requires it, and that is exactly what fraudsters use to impersonate your real suppliers and redirect payments. I verify your top 500 suppliers and their actual bank accounts, and your AP team checks every payment against the verified list before release, with no ERP project. The pilot is $4,500, under most micro-purchase thresholds. Can I take 20 minutes to show you the verified-payee report I built from a county's published vendor file?

landing page

Stop paying impostors pretending to be your vendors $4,500 pilot: your top 500 suppliers and their bank accounts verified within 30 days Request a quote packet for purchasing

deposit terms

This pilot order commits $4,500, payable on invoice at kickoff after your purchase order is issued, for verification of your top 500 suppliers and their bank accounts within 30 days. It reserves your jurisdiction a founding seat in the first five-member registry cohort, with the founding subscription rate locked for three years. Cancel in writing any time before kickoff at no charge; if we miss the 30-day delivery, the invoice is voided.

Would you run this test?

One tap. The yes-share feeds the Demand pillar of this idea's score; nobody sees who answered.

Budgets are out-of-pocket estimates for a team of one to three, US market. Size the deposit to the deal, and check the terms before taking money in a regulated line.

Scorecard

One score that balances how trendy the idea is, the demand for it and its potential for 100x, with competition measured relative to every other idea in the catalog. Recent startup trends first, government priorities second.

77

Idea Score, 0-100 · raw 48.0 x 1.61

Warm

competition: more crowded than 20% of ideas · headwind x0.90

+1.9

government priorities, secondary (5 matching grants)

Trend

46

Is the wave forming now? 2025-26 entrants vs 2023-24, rounds since 2025, the sector's live-batch direction, the 2026 trend analyst.

  • Entrants 2025-26 vs 2023-24 (similar companies)23
  • Rounds announced 2025+ in the sector87
  • Sector direction (live batch)50
  • 2026 trend analyst25

Demand

52

Does anyone want it? YC's current RFS, companies already paid for something similar, the operator judge, founders' yes-rate in decks, readers who would run the test.

  • YC asks for it (current RFS: idea / sector)30
  • Someone already pays (similar companies, recent / all-time)100
  • Operator judge: real pain25

100x potential

56

Can it return a fund? The venture judge (double weight), market-size and moat axes, neighbours still alive, the technologist judge.

  • Venture judge50
  • Market size axis33
  • Moat axis100
  • Neighbours still alive79
  • Technologist judge25

Score = 100 x cbrt(Trend x Demand x 100x) x (1 - 0.5 x crowding) + government bonus (max 5), calibrated so the 95th-percentile idea scores 90 (order never changes). A geometric mean: a weak pillar cannot be papered over. Percentiles are among the 272 ideas in the catalog; the terms matched were global, registry, stops, government, payments, impostor, suppliers, shared.

The idea in full

What
Attestry is a shared registry of verified government suppliers and their real bank accounts: before a treasury or municipality releases a payment, its ERP checks the payee against the registry through a no-code integration. A supplier verified once by any member government is trusted by every other member, and Attestry's ops team does the verification legwork that individual finance offices cannot. It is sold as an annual subscription to public treasuries through the eprocurement and ERP integrators that already hold those relationships.
Why now
Effectiv AI, a fraud-orchestration platform aimed at financial institutions, went inactive in 2024, and today 7 of the last two years' companies still pitch 'financial institutions' while none in the brief sells payment fraud protection to the public sector - governments, which publish their vendor lists and payment calendars, are the most impersonated and least defended payers.
Wedge: first customer and entry point
A two-person team signs five mid-size city and county treasuries through one government ERP reseller, verifying just their top 500 suppliers each, and publishes the first cross-jurisdiction verified-payee list.
Path to 100x
Government payment-integrity and vendor-verification software is a $1-10B market, and a registry is winner-takes-most by construction: every verified supplier makes the network more valuable to every unjoined government, and every joined government makes verification free for thousands of suppliers. The 100x case is Attestry becoming the default payee-trust layer wired into government ERPs worldwide through channel partners, with the verified entity-to-bank-account graph as a data asset no second registry can rebuild.
Ceiling
National governments mandating their own domestic registries would fragment the network into country silos and cap Attestry as a mid-size integrator of registries rather than the registry.
Closest real companies, as the generator saw them
CRS Group positions as the single platform for credit, fraud, and compliance for financial institutions, not governments; Effectiv AI (inactive 2024) orchestrated bank fraud tools; Analog Financial automates compliance-sensitive money movement for private parties, not a public payee registry.
Main risk
Public procurement cycles are slow enough that the registry may run out of runway before it reaches the density that makes membership self-evident.

Five judges

Each judge scores every idea in the catalog with a named rubric; the venture judge decides whether a card is shown at all (4-5 is venture-grade).

  • Venture investor

    3/5

    Registry network effects are real, but public procurement cycles are slow enough that the card itself names runway as the binding constraint.

  • Bootstrapper

    2/5

    Manual verification of 500 suppliers per treasury is field-ops labor against public procurement cycles the card itself admits may outlast runway.

  • Operator

    2/5

    The registry is worthless until many governments join, so it needs the whole public sector to move first through multi-year procurement cycles.

  • Technologist

    2/5

    The verification legwork is a manual ops team and the integration is a no-code ERP payee check, so the registry data is the only asset.

  • Risk

    3/5

    Diversified across many public treasuries with no license needed, though channel access sits with government ERP resellers and procurement cycles may outlast runway.

  • trends

    2/5

    Why-now is an empty-field claim built on Effectiv AI's 2024 death; nothing in 2025-2026 newly enables a supplier registry that was buildable years ago.

Similar startups in the directory

Companies whose pitch matches most of the idea's terms (global, registry, stops, government, payments, impostor, suppliers, shared): 20 all-time, 1 from the last two years. Same matching as Idea Check.

  • Bulk MRO Industrial Supplyyc W17 · 2017 · Commerce and marketplacesalive

    Full Stack Fintech and Supply Chain Platform for Global Trade

  • CarbonGraphplugandplay · Climate and energyalive

    Discover and share the carbon footprint of your products.

  • BeeSafe AIyc W26 · 2026 · Security and compliancealive

    Frontier AI Defenses for Social Engineering Attacks

  • Cedalioyc S23 · 2023 · Vertical AI agentsalive

    AI agents that automate AP, procurement, and finance

  • Pagaloopyc W21 · 2021 · Fintechalive

    Pay, Get Paid and Extend Cash Flow using your Credit Card as…

  • Oicoyc S20 · 2020 · Commerce and marketplacessite down

    B2B marketplace for construction material in Brazil.

  • Papayc S18 · 2018 · Healthcare and bioalive

    One-stop-shop for flexible family care

  • Ripple Labs500global · 1970 · Fintechacquired

    Developer of a blockchain platform designed to build breakthrough crypto technology for a world without economic borders. The company's platform offers an open-source payment system using a math-based virtual currency that helps in free payments to merchants, consumers, and developers, enabling global financial institutions, businesses, governments, and developers to move, manage, and tokenize value and customers to pay in any currency with no chargebacks and instant global payment options.

  • Fawaterakplugandplay · Fintechalive

    Fawaterak, an online payments platform helping small and micro businesses to process all their payments online through integrating local and global payment networks in one dashboard featured by powerful tools for collect payments locally and globally .

  • 株式会社digglueplugandplay · Commerce and marketplacesalive

    Digglue supports DX using blockchain and AI, mainly for the manufacturing industry.

  • Deepen AIplugandplay · Robotics and physical worldalive

    Deepan AI is a provider of multi-sensor AI, tools and services intended to focused on the robotics, driver assistance and autonomous driving space.

  • USYNCROplugandplay · Commerce and marketplacesalive

    Synchronizes Global trade. Simplify the management of your shipments by synchronizing every party involved, transactions and documents in one place.

Run this as an Idea Check →

The generator's reference companies

Real companies the model named as closest when it wrote the card, with their fate. A check mark is a company the radar could verify in its directory.

Public money in this direction

US federal grants, SBIR/STTR awards and open opportunities from the radar's public-money feed, matched to the idea's terms; the sector totals give the context.

6

grants and programs matching the idea

2

startup-relevant grants in Fintech

$809K

awarded in the sector, tracked

All public money by sector →

Market signal

What the radar sees in Fintech: new companies by cohort year, the forming YC batch, and outcomes since the February snapshot.

Fintech · 256 → 148 → 186 → 125 → 99 new companies 2022 → 2026 · 89% aliveYC F26 live: 7 in this cluster, 6% of the batch (was 5% in S26)Since February, of 592 YC companies here: 11 acquired, 8 shut down, 56 rewrote their pitch

Fintech: companies, trend and grants →

Design attributes

The card is one cell of a designed set: every axis below was chosen before the text was written, and the text had to realize it.

Buyer
Government and public sector
Business model
Software subscription
Path to 100x
Network effects, winner takes most
Market size
$1-10B market
Capital intensity
Capital-medium (ops, field teams)
Speed to revenue
Revenue in 1-3 years
Technical depth
Integrations, no-code
Go-to-market
Partners and channels
Moat
Data moat
Geography
Global from day one
Regulation
Some regulation
Vibe
Hot space

Listed under

An idea sits in its own sector and in any sector its text clearly touches.

More ideas like this

Fintech · Fintech

Bookzero

Software that closes a small company's books for a tenth of a bookkeeper's price.

Bookzero is self-serve subscription software that connects to a small business's bank feeds, invoices and payroll and produces a finished monthly close - categorized ledger, reconciliations, financial statements - for roughly $100 a month against the $800-1,500 SMBs pay outsourced bookkeepers.

Score 83Warm competitionVC 5/5Software subscriptionSmall businesstest: $1.2k · 4w79% of 3 neighbours alive

Fintech · Fintech

Parbook

The self-serve secondary market where institutions trade private credit loan participations.

Parbook is a marketplace where private credit funds, insurers and regional banks list, price and settle loan participations and portfolio slices, using a standardized machine-readable data tape that Parbook generates from each seller's loan documents.

Score 72Active competitionVC 5/5MarketplaceEnterprisetest: $2k · 6w79% of 3 neighbours alive

Fintech · Fintech

Perilex

An exchange where machine-priced corporate risk is listed and capital bids.

Perilex is a listing venue for idiosyncratic corporate risk that traditional carriers price badly: fleet and telematics-driven liability, compute and outage exposure, model-failure liability.

Score 72Active competitionVC 5/5MarketplaceEnterprisetest: $1.5k · 5w96% of 4 neighbours alive

Fintech · Fintech

Countersign

Spend controls and audit trail for every dollar an enterprise's AI agents move.

Countersign sits between a company's agents and whatever rails they spend on - issued cards, wallets, stablecoin accounts - enforcing per-agent budgets, merchant allowlists and human approval thresholds before authorization, then reconciling each settled charge back to the agent run and prompt that caused it.

Score 68Crowded competitionVC 5/5Software subscriptionEnterprisetest: $700 · 3w96% of 4 neighbours alive

Fintech · Fintech

Underwatt

Underwriting software that prices AI data center risk from live power and thermal telemetry.

Underwatt sells a subscription platform to carriers, MGAs and reinsurers that prices property, business-interruption and outage risk on GPU data centers using a telemetry fleet Underwatt installs itself: power quality recorders, thermal and coolant sensors, and grid interconnect feeds at the insured sites.

Score 62Crowded competitionVC 4/5Software subscriptionEnterprisetest: $1.9k · 6w96% of 4 neighbours alive

Fintech · Fintech

Subrix

AI agents that settle claims between insurance carriers on one shared network.

Subrix runs autonomous agents that handle subrogation - the process where one insurer recovers claim costs from another at-fault party's insurer.

Score 60Crowded competitionVC 5/5AI agent as a serviceEnterprisetest: $1k · 6w82% of 4 neighbours alive
Swipe ideas like this in the deckTalk to the radar about it

Fictional company written 2026-08-26 from MarkosWeb data; the companies, grants and numbers around it are real and tracked. Treat the idea as a research prompt, not a plan.