Is coj.net your website? Verify ownership to confirm this record, add missing facts, and get the verified badge. Free - scores can be improved, never bought.
coj.net
Jacksonville.gov - Welcome
AI Agentic Readiness
8 / 28
agentic checks passed 44% readiness - how well this site can be read, trusted and transacted with by AI agents
Last checked
coj.net is live and passes 8 of 28 agentic-readiness checks (44%). It is served over HTTPS.
For AI agents, coj.net's strongest signals are clean semantic HTML, fully indexable pages, a lightweight page, and an efficient render path. Approximately 802 DOM nodes.
Its main gaps are no canonical URL, few clear definitions, no self-contained answer passages, and no Schema.org structured data. The weakest area is Structured data; addressing it first would raise this score the most.
Agent interaction
✓Semantic HTML5 & AccessibilityARIA attributes found for accessibility
~Clean, Crawlable HTMLMultiple H1 tag(s) found (2)
~Extraction Friction ScoreHigh jargon density in opening content
✓Indexability & Snippet EligibilityPages are indexable and snippet-eligible - the precondition for Google AI features is met
~Layout Stability & Responsiveness10/10 images lack explicit width/height - the most common cause of layout shift (CLS)
✗Canonical URL StrategyNo canonical URL tag found
✓Page Speed: Page SizeApproximately 802 DOM nodes
✓Page Speed: Load Blockers1 render-blocking script(s) in <head>
Machine extraction
~Table & List ExtractabilityNo HTML tables found across homepage
~Sentence AtomicityAverage 28% atomic sentences across 1 pages (target 40%+)
✓Entity DensityAverage entity density 37.1% across 1 pages (target >15%)
✗Definition PatternsOnly 2 definition pattern(s) found
✗Answer Capsule Pattern0/11 H2 sections have 15-30 word self-contained capsules (0%)
Structured data
✗Schema.org Structured DataNo JSON-LD structured data found across homepage
✗Speakable SchemaNo JSON-LD found across homepage - cannot assess speakable schema
AI discovery
✗llms.txt FileNo llms.txt file found at https://coj.net/llms.txt (connection failed)
~robots.txt for AI CrawlersNo explicit AI crawler rules in robots.txt
✓Sitemap Completeness1332 URLs in sitemap
?RSS/Atom FeedNot assessed
✗Internationalization SignalsNo hreflang alternate links found
?Content Licensing & AI PermissionsNot assessed
Trust & transparency
✓Entity Authority & E-E-A-TSocial media / sameAs references found on homepage
✗Creator TransparencyCreator visibility is weak on content-like pages
~Methodology TransparencyLittle content-production or review transparency is visible
~AI Assistance DisclosureNo AI-assistance disclosure found on sampled pages (neutral - the engine cannot tell whether AI was used)
~Visible Date Signal8 visible <time> element(s) with datetime attribute found across homepage
✓Title & Meta Quality1/1 pages lack a usable meta description
~Content Freshness SignalsNo JSON-LD date properties (datePublished/dateModified) found across homepage
✗Author & Expert SchemaNo Person schema found across homepage
Every check is a verifiable fact about coj.net's live pages. Scoring follows Google Lighthouse agentic-browsing: a fraction of concrete checks, not an invented 0-100.
How to improve for AI agents
The highest-impact changes to make coj.net more agent-ready, in priority order.
1 Add structured tables and lists high impactlow effort
Present coj.net's comparison and spec data as real HTML tables and lists agents can extract.
2 Add JSON-LD structured data critical impactmedium effort
Mark up coj.net's homepage with Schema.org JSON-LD (Organization, WebSite) an agent can read as facts.
3 Add content freshness signals high impactlow effort
Refresh and re-date coj.net's key pages so agents see it as maintained.